Saba George Nanobashvili vs Nico Jaeger Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
S. George Nanobashvili vs N. Jaeger

Saba George Nanobashvili
SWE
w
w
l
l
w
l
w
l
w
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
21
Age
22
-
Height
-
0
C. Rank
0
0
Best Rank
0
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
-

Nico Jaeger
SUI
w
l
l
l
w
l
l
l
l
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
21
Age
22
-
Height
-
0
C. Rank
0
0
Best Rank
0
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
-
Head-to-head: Nanobashvili 1 - 0 Jaeger
They have played 2 sets in total, with Saba George Nanobashvili winning 2 and Nico Jaeger winning 0. The last match between Saba George Nanobashvili and Nico Jaeger was at the M15 Monastir, 18-02-2024, Round: Q1, Surface: Hard, with Saba George Nanobashvili getting the victory 6-2 6-3.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Nanobashvili | 1 |
| Jaeger | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(Q1) M15 Monastir(02-18-24)
Saba George Nanobashvili
6
6
Nico Jaeger
2
3
S. G. Nanobashvili vs N. Jaeger H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 46.58% (34-39) | Career Total W/L | 35.29% (24-44) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
S. G. Nanobashvili vs N. Jaeger Match Preview:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Saba George Nanobashvili has won 36.00% of points on their second serve, while Nico Jaeger has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Saba George Nanobashvili, in recent form, has won 51.07% of their opponent's second serve points, while Nico Jaeger has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 32.04% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Saba George Nanobashvili has saved 47.06% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Nico Jaeger has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Saba George Nanobashvili has won 42.31% of matches played (W/L 11/15), with Nico Jaeger winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Saba George Nanobashvili has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 56% (W/L 19/15), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 35% (W/L 11/20). Nico Jaeger has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 56% (W/L 15/22), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 29% (W/L 9/22).
- Player level: In the last year, Saba George Nanobashvili has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 42.31% of matches (W/L 11/15), where as Nico Jaeger has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Saba George Nanobashvili winning 1 times and Nico Jaeger being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Saba George Nanobashvili winning 2 and Nico Jaeger winning 0.
- The last match between Saba George Nanobashvili and Nico Jaeger was at the M15 Monastir, 18-02-2024, Round: Q1, Surface: Hard, with Saba George Nanobashvili getting the victory 6-2 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Saba George Nanobashvili has played against opponents with an average rank of 51.58 while Nico Jaeger has played against players with an average rank of 0.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Saba George Nanobashvili has won 57% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Nico Jaeger has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Saba George Nanobashvili has converted 38.89% of breakpoint opportunities, and Nico Jaeger has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Saba George Nanobashvili vs Nico Jaeger Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
S. G. Nanobashvili vs N. Jaeger H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 5 |
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Nanobashvili 37%, Jaeger 0%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Nanobashvili 52%, Jaeger 0%.
Break Points Saved %: Nanobashvili 53%, Jaeger 0%.
S. G. Nanobashvili Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Q2 | L | 6-2 6-0 | ||
Q1 | W | 6-7(8) 6-1 10-1 | ||
Q3 | L | 6-1 6-3 | ||
Q1 | W | 6-1 6-1 | ||
R2 | L | 6-3 6-3 | ||
N. Jaeger Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | L | 5-0 ret. | ||
Q1 | L | 6-2 6-3 | ||
Q1 | L | 6-0 6-0 | ||
Q1 | L | 6-2 6-1 | ||
Q3 | L | 6-0 6-3 | ||

S. G. Nanobashvili vs N. Jaeger Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 46.58% (34/39) | YTD Win/Loss | 35.29% (24/44) |
| 46.34% (76/88) | Sets Win/Loss | 39.33% (59/91) |
| 48.65% (775/818) | Games Win/Loss | 45.24% (661/800) |
| 55.88% (19/15) | Hard Win/Loss | 40.54% (15/22) |
| 35.48% (11/20) | Clay Win/Loss | 29.03% (9/22) |
| 50.00% (4/4) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.1 | Aces Per Game | 0.03 |
| 81 | Aces Total | 21 |
| 0.26 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.05 |
| 200 | Total Double Faults | 39 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 129.1 | Average Opponent Rank | 166.01 |
| 58% (1613/2762) | 1st Serve % | 60% (513/858) |
| 61% (991/1613) | 1st Serve Win % | 58% (296/513) |
| 41% (476/1149) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (168/345) |
| 49% (129/264) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (25/56) |
| 42% (1090/2572) | Return Points Win % | 34% (255/745) |
| 46.58% (34/39) | Futures W/L | 35.29% (24/44) |
| 47% (34/72) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 36% (24/67) |
| 47% (7/15) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 61% (11/18) |
| 58% (11/19) | Deciding Set Win % | 27% (4/15) |
| 80% (35/28) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 73% (33/24) |
| 20% (35/7) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 27% (33/9) |
| 16% (38/6) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (35/0) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
08:30 PM 16/11/25
Prediction02:00 AM 17/11/25
Prediction11:00 AM 17/11/25
Prediction08:30 AM 17/11/25
Prediction04:00 AM 17/11/25
Prediction02:00 AM 17/11/25
PredictionTennis Previews & Betting Tips
16 Nov 2025
Simona Waltert vs Solana Sierra Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group C – 16th November 2025 Best Bets
16 Nov 2025
Linda Noskova vs Antonia Ruzic Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group D – 16th November 2025 Best Bets
16 Nov 2025
Iga Swiatek vs Gabriela Lee Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group B – 16th November 2025 Best Bets
16 Nov 2025
Carlos Alcaraz vs Jannik Sinner Prediction – ATP Nitto ATP Finals – 16th November 2025 Best Bets
16 Nov 2025
Ella Seidel vs Hanne Vandewinkel Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group F – 16th November 2025 Best Bets
16 Nov 2025
Prediction Of Alcaraz Vs Sinner H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Nitto Atp Finals 2025?
Top Predictions Today
20:05
H2H 10-5
18:45
H2H 1-0
H2H 0-0
Tennis Events This Week
Nitto ATP Finals - Turin
Italy
Bergamo Challenger
Italy
Champaign Challenger
United States
Drummondville Challenger
Canada
Florianopolis Challenger
Brazil
Guayaquil Challenger
Ecuador
Montemar Challenger
Spain
Montevideo Challenger
Uruguay
Soma Bay Challenger
Egypt
Sydney Challenger
Australia
Yokohama Challenger
Japan
M15 Alcala de Henares
Spain
M15 Bhubaneswar
India
M15 Gimcheon
Korea, Rep.
M15 Kuala Lumpur
Malaysia
M15 Monastir
Tunisia
M15 Olavarria
Argentina
M15 Sharm ElSheikh
Egypt
M25 Antalya
Turkey
M25 Cochabamba
Bolivia
M25 Heraklion
Greece
M25 Luanda
Angola
M25 Manzanillo
Mexico
M25 Vale do Lobo
Portugal